$22M Shortfall Threatens Vaccinations, Refugee Services in Austin

Austin's public health officials are sounding the alarm over severe repercussions stemming from substantial federal funding cuts, which have resulted in a $22 million budget deficit for Austin Public Health (APH). The recent cuts, part of a larger trend in federal public health funding reductions nationwide, have led to program closures and job losses, with additional cuts anticipated shortly.

“Programs are being shut down, colleagues are facing job losses, and over time, our community members may fall ill and potentially lose their lives,” stated Ashlee Kraus, a board member of Austin Public Health.

In a significant development, the Big Cities Health Coalition has revealed that nationwide public health funding has been reduced by a staggering $12 billion in 2025. Protesters gathered outside Austin City Hall, vocally expressing their demands for action from city leaders with chants of “Save public services.”

Several programs, including immunization services, refugee health care, and community health education, face significant impacts. “Without public funding to support vaccination services, our community will be unable to access the essential healthcare they require,” stated Nicole Doggett, a nurse with APH.

Zachary Newton, an employee of the Austin Public Health department, issued a serious caution to city officials: “If you opt to implement additional cuts to APH, you are conveying a distinct message to the residents of this city that you do not prioritize their health, safety, or well-being.”

The state of Texas is facing a significant Measles outbreak, intensifying the urgency surrounding the ongoing funding crisis. Brydan Summers, president of AFSCME Local 1624, highlighted the potential dangers associated with various health initiatives, stating, “Immunizations, refugee health services, community health education.” All of those are currently at risk.

Josh Blank, the research director at the Texas Politics Project, emphasized that although public health may not consistently dominate voter concerns, it is broadly acknowledged as a fundamental duty of government. “While Public Health may not be a top priority, it is important to note that the government has limited discretionary spending when examining the federal budget,” he stated.

In a recent statement, President Donald Trump stood by the cuts, asserting, “In 100 days, we have delivered the most profound change in Washington in nearly 100 years.”

Health care workers, community members, and local leaders are actively advocating for the restoration of funding, highlighting the potential consequences for lives and community well-being if essential services are not safeguarded.

‍